Plausible Deniability – The Obama Administration Defined

Plausible Deniability – The Obama Administration Defined

The words Plausible Deniability were invented, inadvertently I am sure, to describe the administration of Barack Hussein Obama, the President of the United States of America.

Barack Hussein Obama; in charge of everything, and apparently, responsible for nothing if his advisers, spokespeople and the American media are to be believed.

From Urban Dictionary; the definition of Plausible Deniability

1. A condition in which a subject can safely and believably deny knowledge of any particular truth that may exist because the subject is deliberately made unaware of said truth so as to benefit or shield the subject from any responsibility associated through the knowledge of such truth.

2. Plausible deniability actually is a legal concept. It refers to lack of evidence proving an allegation. Standards of proof vary in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is “more likely so than not” whereas in a criminal matter, the standard is “beyond a reasonable doubt” If your opponent lacks incontrovertible proof (evidence) of their allegation, you can “plausibly deny” the allegation even though it may be true.

3. When it is acceptable for a party to lie about what they did because the truth would hurt too much and cause many problems.

No Role for Obama

It appears to me that many in the Obama administration are more than prepared to ‘take a bullet’ for Barack Hussein Obama. Some are ready to sacrifice their lives, families and careers to protect Obama and to make him appear to be in NO WAY responsible for the heinous and reprehensible acts of his incompetent regime.

The Obama scandals – The IRS, Health and Human Services, Department of Justice, The EPA, Fast and Furious, Benghazi and the hacking of reporters and news services emails and private records, should be more than enough to bring the Obama regime down in a huge, smoking heap.

Continue reading

Posted in America 1st | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay members

Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay members

BSA LogoGRAPEVINE, Texas – The Boy Scouts of America’s National Council has voted to ease a long-standing ban and allow openly gay boys to be accepted as Scouts.

Of the local Scout leaders voting at their annual meeting in Texas, more than 60 percent supported the proposal.

Under the proposal drafted by the Scouts’ governing board, gay adults will remain barred from serving as Scout leaders.

The outcome is unlikely to end a bitter debate over the Scouts’ membership policy.

Some conservative churches that sponsor Scout units wanted to continue excluding gay youths, in some cases threatening to defect if the ban were lifted. More liberal Scout leaders — while supporting the proposal to accept gay youth — have made clear they want the ban on gay adults lifted as well. SOURCE

Once again I am venturing out into that area of life that may gain me some NEW haters and increase my hate mail and SPAM because, once again, I am about to speak from the heart, political correctness be damned.

Queer Scouts

The Boy Scouts have just imploded in MY not so humble opinion. The have voted to accept GAY members, and that is going to destroy the BSA.

I personally refuse to call it GAY, I won’t bastardize the word GAY by attaching it to the perversion that IS homosexuality. That is where my non-politically correct tilt comes in.

The word GAY – once upon a time it was defined as merry, cheerful, jolly, joyful, blithe, mirthful and happy.

Today it is defined as, when used as an adjective — homosexual (of a person, esp. a man) and when used as a Noun – A homosexual, esp. a man.

Homosexuality is NOT normal, it is a perversion and it should still be treated as such.

From Facebook — Texas Values President, Jonathan Saenz, released the following statement about the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) decision:

“This tragic decision is the result of personal political ideology by BSA national leaders who willing opened the door to allow homosexual advocates to overrun an organization that stands for a code of morality that these intolerant advocates reject. The BSA is a private organization, but it has chosen to place sex and politics above its timeless principles, and the BSA will likely ultimately fail because of this change. We’ll next see aggressive attacks on any BSA units that dare stand for God and religious liberty as those that seek to change the BSA will not tolerate these current BSA principles either.”

Continue reading

Posted in WTF? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

London terror attack leaves 1 dead near barracks

London terror attack leaves 1 dead near barracks

British FlagLONDON (AP) – In a brutal daylight attack which raised fears that terrorism had returned to London, two men with butcher knives hacked another man to death near a military barracks Wednesday before police wounded them in a shootout.

In a shocking video broadcast on British TV, one man gestured with bloodied hands, waving a butcher knife in the air and shouting political statements against the British government as pedestrians milled about a body lying motionless on the street. Bloodstains coated the street. SOURCE

I have heard many lament the death of this British soldier, and I am saddened that it happened, that he was butchered by Islamic ANIMALS as he walked down a British street, very close to his barracks.

Of course the soldier was unarmed, as are most all British citizens, but according to some reports it took approximately 20 minutes for an ARMED Police unit to arrive at the scene.

Yes, I said an ARMED Police unit; you see, many British Police are apparently unarmed as well.

Can you imagine this happening on a street here in Texas? Before you answer that remember the Fort Hood shooter, Nidal Hasan? NOW can you imagine this happening on a street here in Texas?

Maybe not, let me explain; Hasan was able to carry out his evil Jihad because American troops are not armed, no one is allowed to carry a firearm on a U.S. military base other than military police or civilian police on post for whatever reason.

A civilian Police Officer, former Fort Hood police sergeant Kimberly Munley was the first officer on the scene and she engaged Hasan in gunfire. That was on Fort Hood, not on your average street in a Texas city.

Unlike the Brits, and a few areas of this United States, we here in Texas have NOT been disarmed and we’re not going to be disarmed. If Hasan had tried his Jihad on a Texas street as opposed to the confines of Fort Hood, Hasan would have most likely met a hail of return fire from Texas Patriots, hopefully causing this Muslim ANIMAL to die, right then and there, thus saving our nation gobs of money.

Some reading this may say, ‘this could never happen anywhere in America, even in gun free zones because we have armed police and they are going to protect us…’

Wrong!

Yes, we DO have armed police, but as the saying goes, when seconds count the police are only minutes away. I know, that sounds crass but it is one of those TRUTHS that I am so well known for.

In a disarmed society, one where LEGAL citizens are deprived of their gun right, say in a place like New York or New Jersey for instance, something similar has already happened. This is from back in February of 2013. Muslim accused of beheading 2 Christians in U.S.

Continue reading

Posted in America 1st | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments